At Excellence Consulting, we understand that a well-managed product backlog is fundamental to the success of any product development initiative. It serves as the single source of truth for all work to be done, driving alignment and ensuring that development efforts consistently deliver value. Without a robust backlog, projects can lose direction, fail to meet customer needs, and ultimately fall short of their potential.
The Crucial Role of a Good Product Backlog
A product backlog is far more than just a list of tasks; it is a living, evolving artifact that guides the entire development effort. For a backlog to be truly effective, it must be Detailed Appropriately, Estimated, Emergent, and Prioritized. Neglecting these qualities can lead to common pitfalls. We often see clients struggling with backlogs that resemble a "wish list for Santa"—a sprawling, unmanageable collection of ideas with no clear direction—or a "requirements specification disguised as a backlog," which stifles emergence and locks in decisions too early.
Best Approaches to Crafting User Stories
User stories are powerful tools for capturing backlog items and ensuring development is centered around user needs. Our approach focuses on making them effective throughout their lifecycle.
Creating User Stories
Tell stories, don't just write them
User stories are primarily reminders for conversations, not detailed specifications. The true value comes from engaging stakeholders and the delivery team in discussions to collaboratively refine understanding.
Focus on behavior change
A good user story describes a change in someone's behavior, clearly articulating the business value. This prevents purely technical stories that don't directly contribute to observable outcomes.
Describe the system change
While focusing on behavior, clarify how the system's functionality or business rules will change. This helps the team understand the scope and estimate complexity.
Approach them as survivable experiments
Frame stories as small chunks of work that deliver value and allow for learning. If an "experiment" proves costly or yields undesirable results, it can be stopped early, minimizing wasted investment.
Avoid generic roles
Instead of "As a user," define specific customer personas. This provides crucial context, helps identify genuine needs, and prevents scope creep.
Consider your zone of control and sphere of influence
The user need should be something you can impact, and the deliverable should be something you can directly implement. Stories outside this pattern may need re-evaluation.
Add "best before" dates
For time-constrained changes, explicitly note an expiry date. This helps manage time-sensitive items proactively and promotes a sustainable pace.
Planning with User Stories
Use hierarchical backlogs
Organize your backlog into multiple tiers (e.g., epics, features, stories). This provides both a big-picture view for stakeholders and detailed slices for the delivery team.
Group stories by impact
Utilize tools like impact maps to visually connect deliverables to business goals. This facilitates high-level prioritization and makes scope creep easy to spot.
Create user story maps
Map out stories against customer journeys and business workflows. This visual tool provides insight into how individual stories contribute to the overall user experience.
Focus milestones on limited user segments
For each milestone, prioritize specific target user segments. This forces a more focused approach, leading to better, more relevant stories.
Set out global concerns at the start
Address cross-cutting concerns like performance and security separately at the beginning of a milestone. These then become design constraints for all stories within that phase.
Prioritize according to stages of growth
Align story prioritization with a growth model (e.g., empathy, stickiness, virality, revenue, scale) to focus on the most critical objectives.
Prioritize using purpose alignment
Categorize stories based on whether they are "mission critical" and "market differentiating" to help stakeholders make clearer prioritization decisions.
Name your milestones meaningfully
Give business milestones names that reflect the capability they represent, not generic version numbers, to improve stakeholder engagement.
Discussing User Stories
Use low-tech for conversations
Physical whiteboards and cards facilitate more dynamic and focused discussions than digital tools, which can become a bottleneck. Digitize the results later.
Imagine the demonstration
During discussions, ask, "How will we demonstrate this story?" This question forces clarity on acceptance criteria and a common understanding of "done."
Involve all relevant roles
Ensure developers, testers, and business representatives actively participate to foster shared understanding and reduce knowledge transfer issues.
Play the devil's advocate
Intentionally challenging a story's need or solution can quickly uncover bad ideas and lead to more innovative solutions.
Divide responsibility for defining stories
Business stakeholders should focus on the "why" (the benefit), while the delivery team proposes several "what" (solution) options.
Split business and technical discussions
Separate meetings for business needs and technical implementation details can make discussions more efficient.
Investigate value on multiple levels
Recognize that stories often have layered value, benefiting different stakeholders (e.g., user, organization). Capturing this provides richer context.
Discuss sliding-scale measurements
For non-functional requirements like performance, define utility breakpoints and barriers rather than single, arbitrary numbers for more meaningful discussions.
Splitting User Stories
Start with the outputs
For large tasks, prioritize delivering minimal viable outputs first, then incrementally build the capabilities to produce them.
Put the "skeleton on crutches"
Ship a simplified UI early, even if it relies on temporary back-end solutions ("crutches"), then iteratively improve the back-end without interrupting the user experience.
Narrow down the customer segment
If a story is too large, narrow the target customer. Deliver everything a small group needs, rather than a small part of what everyone needs.
Split by examples of usefulness
For complex technical changes, identify specific examples of how the change would be useful. Each example can become a smaller, valuable story.
Split by capacity
Progressively build up system capacity (e.g., file size, concurrent users). This allows for earlier releases and helps de-risk large-scale migrations.
Start with dummy, then move to dynamic
For data-entry or reference data, start with hard-coded data to enable early functionality. Subsequent stories can then integrate with dynamic data sources.
Simplify outputs
Instead of integrating with complex legacy systems immediately, simplify outputs (e.g., save to Excel) to de-risk short-term plans.
Split learning from earning
Separate research tasks ("learning stories") from features that deliver direct value ("earning stories"). Time-box learning stories to manage uncertainty.
When all else fails, slice the hamburger
Visualize technical components as layers and quality attributes as "slices" through them to identify value-oriented slices at different quality levels.
Managing Iterative Delivery
Not all work fits the user story format. Internal tasks like infrastructure upgrades should be managed with a separate time budget to avoid cluttering the backlog. Use budgets instead of precise estimates to acknowledge uncertainty, and avoid using numeric story points for long-term planning. After delivery, always check outcomes with real users to validate assumptions, and then throw the story card away—integrating its tests and specifications into documentation organized by functional area, not as a historical log of changes.
By integrating these practices, we help our clients transform their product backlog from a static list into a dynamic, collaborative roadmap for continuous value delivery, ensuring their products are built effectively and loved by customers.